West St. Paul loosened its rules on where sex offenders can live Monday night, after struggling to strike a balance between residents’ concerns and possible legal repercussions of its highly restrictive policy. Full Article
Related posts
-
MN: Minnesota dad murders registrant with moose antler while under ‘after he stalked his 1-year-old daughter’ delusion
Source: themirror.com 11/24/25 Levi Axtell was charged with second-degree murder for the 2023 killing of Lawrence... -
MN: Minnesota Sex Offender Program marks 30 years of failure and injustice
Source: minnesotareformer.com 8/30/24 As Minnesota marks 30 years of the Minnesota Sex Offender Program this week,... -
MN: Study: Minnesota’s sex offender civil commitment system is ‘failed investment’
Source: startribune.com 4/24/24 The state is spending more than $110 million this year on a sex...

“I’m not thrilled about changing it,” Mayor Jenny Halverson said.
—–
Too bad, Madam Mayor. I’m guessing he wasn’t too thrilled about having to comply with it. Welcome to Constitutional Law 101.
““Nobody wants anybody who’s nasty living next to them,” said Rosemary Piekarski Krech, an Inver Grove Heights council member.”
Say no more. Someone please remind this woman – no, this elected official and council member – that this ordinance refers to some magical invisible barrier around schools, parks and daycares. To, you know, protect the children in these settings. NOT around her house. Her statement makes it abundantly clear that this is banishment for other’s personal benefit. This should be used in every law suit dealing with the subject. Thank you very much.